|
|
|
January 2012 |
|
SCV Family Chiropractic
Healthy Living
Greetings and Happy New Year! Welcome to 2012! I hope you did something special to ring in the new year. I actually welcomed the new year not with a bang, but with a splash! This year is going to be a year of adventure for me, so my daughter, Jennifer and I became official members of the Santa Clarita Polar Bear Club (and we have the bracelets to prove it) ;-) . If you don't know what the Polar Bear Club is, well, in Santa Clarita, we met at the aquatic center on the first at 9am and went down the big slide. As you may recall (or maybe you don't recall since most of you were still sleeping), the weather was beautiful--65 degrees and barely a breeze. The water, on the other hand, not so warm but at least I was told that it was 50. Jennifer didn't know that she was doing this so she made me go first. Although when we got to the top of the slide, she went first. I still don't know how she managed to keep her head dry (that is something that I would usually do). I, on the other hand, couldn't slow down and was completely submerged! To drag a teenager out of bed on the first (or any day that they are able to sleep in) at that hour of the morning, let's just say was a major accomplishment. At the end of it all, she kinda sorta maybe had just an ok time. Translated into English=Wow that was fun! Can we do it again?!
Regardless of how you welcomed in 2012, the beginning of the year always gets people focusing on their health and their New Year's Resolutions. I don't do resolutions, since they are usually broken in the first week of the year anyway. This year, Jennifer and I made vision boards. We spent New Year's weekend cutting pictures and words out of all sorts of magazines and putting them onto poster board. So far, she has completed 6 and I have completed 4. Why am I telling you this? Well, one of the things on my board is to run the Disneyland Half Marathon this Labor Day weekend and. I have never really liked running (let's face it, I hate running; I haven't run really since high school and I avoided it when I could back then too), but this is a new year and a new me. The more people I tell about my goal, the more people there are to hold me accountable. So far, there is a list of practice members who will join me in the marathon and the list is growing. You are all welcome to join in the fun with Mickey, Minnie and all the gang. If you are interested, you need to go to www.rundisney.com to register on January 18th. I understand it is pretty popular and will fill up, so if you are thinking about doing it, just sign up! I figure I will do a 5K in the spring, a 10K in the summer and then the half marathon. I am just getting started on my program (I at least downloaded the "couch to 5K" app on my iphone (back in November) and have at least looked at it twice), so if you are an expert in training for marathons, have done one in the past or are even looking to run one for the first time, just let me know and we can work together! Let's face it-- if you are going to run a marathon, why not do it at the Happiest Place on Earth (in Anaheim)?! To reward myself, I am planning on staying at the Grand Californian and spending the day after the marathon at their spa having a much deserved massage!
One thing I am very excited to offer soon is a report to find out what your wellness number is. It will be a short questionaire that you fill out to find your wellness score and the higher the number the better. Look for more information soon in an email or check out our website and facebook page for up to date info.
I would like to leave you with a special New Year Message for you...
"Believe"
Believe in Yourself-- in the power you have to control your own life, day by day...
Believe in the strength that you have deep inside, and your faith will help show you the way...
Believe in tomorrow and what it will bring-- let a hopeful heart carry you through...
For things will work out if you trust and believe there's no limit to what you can do!!
The sky's the limit, so have your happiest year yet!!
Happy New Year!!
Yours In Health,
Dr. Joanne, Michelle, Julie and Sheila
|
|
|
For Neck Pain, Chiropractic and Exercise Are Better Than Drugs The headline above is from a January 7, 2012 article in the health section of the New York Times. This article, as well as a similar one from Medical Press on January 4, 2012, is based on research published on January 3, 2012 in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
The care in each of the three groups lasted only 12 weeks in this study. The people in the study were asked to rate their pain initially and at various points thereafter up to 12 months later. The level of pain was recorded for each of the participants at the intervals of at 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. The results reported that chiropractic adjustments did better in helping neck pain patients and showed "a statistically significant advantage over medication after 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks." Even though the care rendered for each of these groups was only for 12 weeks, the long term follow-up showed that 53 percent of the people who had received chiropractic continued to report at least a 75 percent reduction in pain. The exercise group also had similar numbers. However, the group taking medication showed only a 38 percent reduction in pain overall. Dr. Gert Bronfort, an author of the study and research professor at Northwestern Health Sciences University in Minnesota, noted his reasons for the study included a lack of information on choices for people with neck pain. "There was a void in the scientific literature in terms of what the most helpful treatments are," Bronfort said. He noted that the results showed chiropractic superior to medications. "Even a year later, there were differences between the spinal manipulation and medication groups," Bronfort said. Not only did the group taking medications not fair as well in pain reduction, there was also a problem with usage as people kept taking them in an attempt to get help. "The people in the medication group kept on using a higher amount of medication more frequently throughout the follow-up period, up to a year later," said Dr. Bronfort. "If you’re taking medication over a long time, then we’re running into more systemic side effects like gastrointestinal problems." |
|
Flu Vaccine Hampers Children's Natural Immunity Warns New Study
Above is the headline from a December 12, 2011 article posted on 121 Doc. The article was based on research published on the November 2011 issue of the Journal of Virology. The research shows that flu vaccine may weaken some children's immune systems to other influenza viruses.
In this study, researchers collected blood samples from 27 healthy, unvaccinated children whose average age was 6 years. The researchers compared these blood samples to the blood samples from 14 children with cystic fibrosis who had received the annual flu shot. The results showed that the unvaccinated children had a superior immune response, involving broader protection against the types of viruses children are exposed to during the flu season. The study results showed that the vaccinations seem to, at least temporarily, increase one type of immunity while decreasing general immunity to many other forms of viruses and other ailments. While studying the effects of seasonal vaccinations, the researchers found that unvaccinated children developed virus-specific T cells that normally increased with age and are required for overall immunity. In contrast, researchers found that the blood samples of vaccinated children showed no increase in number of virus-specific CD8 T cells over time. The articles and study note that many countries do not recommend routine flu vaccinations to healthy individuals and children. Dr. Bodewes, wrote, "Most countries recommend annual flu vaccination of certain high-risk groups to protect against seasonal influenza. Furthermore, some countries recommend annual influenza vaccination of all healthy children more than six months of age." |
|
Resolution of Breech Presentations Following Adjustment of Subluxations
The research published in the Journal of Pediatric, Maternal & Family Health on December 12, 2012 documents a series of cases of breech pregnancies that were resolved following chiropractic care.
The case series reviewed 7 documented cases of women who had a breech presentation late in their pregnancy, and were helped with chiropractic. Several of the cases presented in the study were very striking in their results. In one of the more interesting cases, a 21-year-old woman was told just one day before her due date that her baby had turned and was now stuck in a breech position. Her physician told her that she needed an immediate “external cephalic version” (ECV – a forceful procedure used to try to turn a baby in-uterine) procedure as she and the baby were in grave danger. The woman scheduled the ECV procedure, but went to a chiropractor before the scheduled appointment. Due to the closeness of her delivery time, the chiropractor performed the Webster technique three times that day. The next morning, the woman was scheduled for the EVC procedure and was to undergo an ultrasound prior to the EVC to determine the baby's positioning. The authors of the study best described the next set of events. “During the ultrasound procedure, the OB-GYNE began ‘flicking’ his finger at the screen as if to test whether it was working or not. For some reason he could not find the head in its previous position just 24 hours prior. Instead, with a sense of disbelief, the medical doctor stated, ‘I don’t believe this; the baby is in the proper vertex position’.” In the conclusion of the study, the authors wrote, “This presentation contributes to the knowledge base that pregnant patients may derive benefits from chiropractic care beyond low back pain.” |
|
When Cancer Screening Does More Harm than Good
The headline above appears in the Healthland section of Time on January 6, 2012, based on a study from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute published on the same day. The article, and several others on the same subject, report that the new study showed that men who routinely have prostate exams do not have a higher death rate than those who do not. In fact, the articles suggest that the screening can lead to unneeded procedures and adverse effects.
Dr. Gerald Andriole, lead author of the study and chief of urologic surgery at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis commented, "The finding is along the lines that routine mass screening of men is probably not very beneficial as far as reducing the chance of dying from prostate cancer." The article reporting on this study notes that the increased number of findings in the men who got regular PSA tests leads to extra procedures that carry their own risks. In a January 6, 2012 ABC Good Morning America article, Dr. David Penson, director of urologic surgery at Vanderbilt University Medical Center noted, "The test is far from perfect, there are many false positives because of other conditions that can elevate PSA levels, such as an enlarged prostate. That can lead to a cascade of events -- prostate biopsies are not comfortable and carry a risk of infection and a small risk of dying." In a CNN article on the same day, Dr. Andriole summed up his recommendations by saying, "In the case of a man undergoing an annual checkup, I would not recommend that a PSA test be included with other 'routine' blood tests without a specific conversation between the doctor and patient or caregiver and patient about the pros and cons for him, the patients' specific circumstances." |
|
Improvements in Developmental Delay, Colic and GERD in a Child Undergoing Chiropractic
A case study published on January 2, 2012 in the Journal of Pediatric, Maternal & Family Health documents the case of a baby girl who was suffering from developmental delay, colic and GERD, and who was helped by chiropractic care.
In this case, a mother brought her 15-month-old daughter to a chiropractor after noticing that the girl was developmentally behind where she should be. These developmental issues included not standing, walking or talking appropriately for her age level. The baby was only crawling, and could not say more that two-syllable words. The study reported that, previously, the mother had brought her baby to the chiropractor at the age of five months. At that time, the baby was suffering from GERD and colic. These issues were both resolved within three chiropractic adjustments. The study was recorded later when the child was 15 months of age and was suffering from the developmental delay issues. A chiropractic examination revealed subluxations in the upper neck. Specific adjustments were initiated once a week for a 19-week period. The results showed that by the third adjustment the child was walking with some assistance. The study reported that by the 6th visit, the child was walking by holding on to a table and had added words to her vocabulary. By the 9th visit, she had taken 6 steps by herself and increased her vocabulary by three more words. An update assessment was done on the 19th visit. At this time, the girl was 19 months of age. She had improved her walking and was now at the level of a 12-month-old. Her speech was at the proper developmental level for her age, and she no longer had any signs of other developmental delays. |
|
FDA to Limit Antibiotics to Treat Livestock to Prevent Superbugs
The headline above appeared in a January 4, 2012 Washington Post Business article, and reports on the US Food and Drug Administration's plan to restrict the usage of certain antibiotics in livestock. The move is being made to reduce the growing risk that the germs that are being created as a result of the widespread use of antibiotics would be stronger and more resistant to treatment, therefore endangering humans.
In opposition to the ban, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association argued that there is not enough scientific evidence to say that the use of antibiotics is unsafe. Their spokesperson, Kristina Butts, stated, "The top priority for cattle producers is to raise healthy cattle because healthy cattle are the foundation of a safe, wholesome food supply." Rep. Louise Slaughter, of New York, a microbiologist who has pressured the federal government on the issue stated, "This is a modest first step by the FDA, but we're really just looking at the tip of the iceberg. We don't have time for the FDA to ploddingly take half-measures. We are staring at a massive public health threat in the rise of antibiotic-resistant superbugs. We need to start acting with the swiftness and decisiveness this problem deserves." In a January 4, 2012, Los Angeles Times article on this issue, Representative Slaughter, who has written legislation in the past intended to prevent antibiotic overuse, concluded, "With over 1 million Salmonella cases in the U.S. each year, at least 30,000 Americans will contract cephalosporin-resistant bacteria every year. I'm glad the FDA is finally acting but how many Americans have needlessly been sickened in the meantime?" |
|
Please help us spread the message of health by forwarding this email newsletter on to others. |